By Hexagon | Leica Geosystems

HomeSuccess StoriesBuilding ConstructionCore Wall Alignment System Keeps Boston's Millennium Tower on...


Core Wall Alignment System Keeps Boston’s Millennium Tower on Schedule

Rising 685 feet into the sky, Millennium Tower Boston is the city’s fifth-tallest building and one of the tallest residential structures, eclipsed only by Winthrop Center completed in early 2023. At the time of the tower’s construction, it was also one of the biggest professional challenges Eric Dionisio, lead engineer for subcontractor S&F Concrete, had ever faced.

“It was taller and bigger than any cast-in-place building we ever worked on,” he says. “Just working from the basement level up to level six was one of our most demanding projects ever.”

In fact, on April 26, 2014, the 6,000 cubic yards of concrete delivered for the foundation slab was the highest volume pour in Boston history for a private development.

Dionisio was responsible, among other things, for the building’s vertical alignment during construction. The sheer height of the building made that a daunting task, as it ruled out conventional methods for maintaining plumb, like transferring ground control (or control from nearby buildings) via total stations. There was also significant time pressure.

“We were the first crew on a newly poured floor,” he explains. “No one else could get started until we set a new zero point on that floor, set control, and completed all layout.”

Excavation-related delays set the construction schedule back eight weeks by the time the third floor was completed. “Fortunately, by floor six, we’d made all that up, and we stayed ahead of schedule from that point.”

Dionisio attributes much of that gain to more efficient establishment of vertical alignment and improved surveying and layout procedures.

Layout and alignment of the new structure was checked every 5th floor by a third party surveyor hired by the general contractor. Thanks to the vertical alignment system, results were within three-eighths of an inch every time.

Active Control Moves Up as Floors Are Completed

For this project, S&F chose the GPS/GNSS-based vertical alignment system developed by Leica Geosystems for use on the Burj Khalifa (world’s tallest building) and One World Trade Center (tallest in the Western Hemisphere). Also called a core wall system, it uses GNSS receivers placed on the building’s exterior protective screen as active control points that move up as floors are completed. On the Millennium Tower, three GNSS receivers were used—two on the north wall and one on the south wall.

A fourth GNSS receiver, used as a base station, was placed permanently on the roof of a nearby building owned by Millennium Partners. This receiver continually referenced the Massachusetts Continuously Operating Reference Station Real-Time Network (MaCORS), operated by MassDOT, to provide redundancy and position checks.

The base station location was chosen mainly for convenience, and Dionisio was initially concerned about its suitability. “It was only at 10 stories and was quite near the Tower, so I wondered if performance would degrade as we started doing work several stories above the base station,” he says. “But by the time we reached 32 stories above the base station, we hadn’t observed any issues with accuracy.”

The working receivers were mounted on brackets on the perimeter protection system, essentially a 40-foot screen and safety structure that surrounded the building under construction. It extended one floor up and two floors down and was moved up as floors were poured and finished.

The receivers were equipped with 360 degree prisms, vertically aligned with receiver antennas, so that the continually updated positions of the receivers could be used by optical total stations and scanners for layout and as-builts. This arrangement was used to position forms after crane lifts, and to ensure that all internal structure was placed properly relative to external walls.

S&F Concrete’s contract included all layout and alignment of the new structure, which was checked every 5th floor by a third party surveyor hired by the general contractor, Suffolk Construction Co. This check was performed with a vertical collimator to basically look straight down through sleeved holes in floor slabs. “We were within three-eighths of an inch every time,” Dionisio says.

Without GNSS, Dionisio would have likely used optical total stations to transfer ground control, floor by floor. It’s a traditional method that has been in use for decades, but it has at least two weaknesses when applied to taller buildings. One is that as the building grows taller, the geometry of optical surveying becomes unfavorable. It’s more difficult to check backsights accurately as sight lines are impeded and instruments have to be pointed nearly straight down. And, thanks to trigonometry, the increasingly acute angles between the working floor and control points on the ground (or nearby buildings) inevitably expand error ellipses.

For business purposes, a less obvious but more important factor is speed; sighting several backsights from multiple positions, and performing and checking resection calculations, is unavoidably tedious, especially since, as mentioned, every other subcontractor (and S&F themselves) on the construction site is waiting for surveyors to finish control so they can perform their layout and install their work on the floor.

On some tall buildings, vertical alignment is maintained with sightings through slab penetrations. Early skyscrapers sometimes used elevator shafts to hang heavy plumb bobs on wire. This system achieves adequate accuracy and was used on Millennium Tower as a check, but its effect on modern tall-building workflows is unworkable.

“If we were dependent for position on the sleeved holes we place for a vertical laser, we would have had to wait until the new slab was nearly cured before we could start work on a floor,” Dionisio explains. “And frankly, that would never happen—crews want to get in there as quickly as possible, and it’s hard to hold them off. We don’t want to be the cause of delays.”

GNSS Provides Reliable, Repeatable Accuracy

“Before we decided on the Leica system, I thought we’d be using a vertical laser that sights through holes placed in new concrete floors,” Dionisio explains. “But that method has a lot of negatives. For one thing, accuracy is only good up to 250 feet or so, and if you set the zero point during a period of sway, accuracy is degraded in a way that affects all subsequent construction.”

And placing holes in slabs is also a problem. They’re set during the pour, which meant that setting the new zero point on a new floor would require a slab that had cured to a point where it could be worked. Actually, at least two points would have had to be sleeved up per floor in order to perform resections. That could hold up work for hours. “As the trades move onto a floor, their stock gets placed wherever it’s needed, and things get crowded,” Dionisio says. “Just keeping vertical sight lines open is a challenge. And, we would have been responsible for closing up holes. Instead, that was someone else’s problem.”

With the Leica core-wall alignment system, the layout crew could move onto a new slab as soon as it could be walked on and set the zero point and critical layout lines before other trades moved in. Since they didn’t have to work around other crews and material stockpiles, the work went faster and was more accurate.

Coordinates were provided in real-time. “I thought at first I’d be doing a lot of static work and post-processing with the GNSS receivers,” Dionisio says. “But we quickly learned that wasn’t necessary.”

An automatic deformation system called GeoMoS, also part of the Leica core-wall alignment system, was used for data management. Dionisio set GeoMoS to compute an average position of the three building-mounted receivers every 15 minutes, and to average those readings every hour. “So to check for sway, I could compare the coordinates we were using to any past set. Over time, I realized that sway was not an issue on this building and that we could always use the real-time coordinates we had for resections. I observed very subtle movement, but nothing that affected our work or overall building tolerances.”

Dionisio says 12 to 14 satellites were in view at all times of day, that vertical alignment was always within a few hundredths of a foot, and that good quality coordinates were always readily available.

The workflow improvements on this project alone justified the investment in new equipment, to the point that S&F Concrete bought another three Leica GNSS receivers for use on other projects while construction of the Millennium Tower Boston was still under way.

To learn more about innovative solutions for core-wall alignment, contact our experts.

Note: A version of this article originally appeared in

Most Read



MDB Finds a Competitive Edge in Public Works Construction with the Right Technology Partners

“We’ve been very successful at getting our models to work with the Leica system. The guys love it, and I don't think our D6...

How to Gain an Advantage in Your MEP Existing Conditions Documentation Workflow

Imagine your firm is asked to submit a bid to modernize the MEP systems of a 10-story institutional building. Floors one and two are...

Is It Time for MEP Contractors to Shelve the Laser Level? Not Yet—And Here’s Why

With just a few days of training on a robotic total station or laser scanner, an MEP contractor can start blazing through site layout...
WordPress Lightbox